<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rec.music.theory Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory</link>
  <description>A forum for discussion of music theory.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/8420a9f8160a8c64?show_docid=8420a9f8160a8c64</link>
  <description>
  [Curt Sachs] &lt;br&gt; The point of Sachs&#39;s analysis is that the major/minor system *didn&#39;t* &lt;br&gt; arise as an outgrowth of modality (maybe you meant to say that, it &lt;br&gt; wasn&#39;t clear to me). Instead, he sees it as the result of the &lt;br&gt; interaction of a very ancient kind of folk tonality found in melodies &lt;br&gt; of narrow range and an instrumental practice that historically arrived
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/8420a9f8160a8c64?show_docid=8420a9f8160a8c64</guid>
  <author>
  bo...@purr.demon.co.uk
  (Jack Campin - bogus address)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 17:11:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Useless theoretical chords</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/944e706e42613d89?show_docid=944e706e42613d89</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Ludwig77&amp;quot; &amp;lt;gregjg...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; Aweful?? That&#39;s just a matter of taste. Anyway, it&#39;s also a matter of &lt;br&gt; context and voicing. Me, I really like the sus6 chord, indeed, I&#39;ve written &lt;br&gt; at least one piece using it as a primary chord. &lt;br&gt; Fiona
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/944e706e42613d89?show_docid=944e706e42613d89</guid>
  <author>
  fi...@no_spam.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk
  (Fiona Abrahami)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 15:54:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Useless theoretical chords</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/059317870e4e6ad0?show_docid=059317870e4e6ad0</link>
  <description>
  The term &amp;quot;useless&amp;quot; is highly subjective in this context. Do you mean chords &lt;br&gt; which are decorative (linear) rather than functional, or chords which in &lt;br&gt; your terms &amp;quot;sound awful&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; For example, one chord you curiously omit would be C, E, Gb, Bb, Db or &lt;br&gt; C7(b5,b9). I use this chord quite frequently both in root position and in
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/059317870e4e6ad0?show_docid=059317870e4e6ad0</guid>
  <author>
  tkor...@comcast.net
  (Tom K.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 15:19:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/863fd66740489633?show_docid=863fd66740489633</link>
  <description>
  By qualified I do not mean that he was not a competent musician or &lt;br&gt; theorist. In order to be qualified to say that the Church music was &lt;br&gt; not representative of the music of the time, he would have to have &lt;br&gt; more access to the secular music of the time. Maybe he had more &lt;br&gt; information than has been shown here, but until I see the music that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/863fd66740489633?show_docid=863fd66740489633</guid>
  <author>
  ljsche...@gmail.com
  (LJS)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 14:10:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Useless theoretical chords</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/685ae6d60357fee1?show_docid=685ae6d60357fee1</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m looking for a list of chords that are theoretical but useless. &lt;br&gt; For instance, on paper, a maj11th is a valid chord, but it sounds &lt;br&gt; awful. The same might go for a suspended 6th chord. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m looking for this list because I teach music and am trying to weed &lt;br&gt; out such chords from a list that I have compiled.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/a51c2e8fc92ee568/685ae6d60357fee1?show_docid=685ae6d60357fee1</guid>
  <author>
  gregjg...@gmail.com
  (Ludwig77)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 11:03:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/c674f1e953d0cebb?show_docid=c674f1e953d0cebb</link>
  <description>
  In any case the hypothesis that he was qualified deserves an &lt;br&gt; attention. I am sure that he was. &lt;br&gt; There is notion of chord notes. I think that the notion sub-scale or &lt;br&gt; somewhat similar may be used instead it. I think that a chord is &lt;br&gt; subordinate technique although very important one. &lt;br&gt; Undoubtedly the Bass is basis as it is his overtones. But main
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/c674f1e953d0cebb?show_docid=c674f1e953d0cebb</guid>
  <author>
  vi...@online.de
  (Vilen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 10:08:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Download Music for Free, 100% Free and Legal</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/365493406f603da8/26f4f9912a042e3a?show_docid=26f4f9912a042e3a</link>
  <description>
  Download Music for Free, 100% Free and Legal &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.techespot.com/2010/03/download-music-for-free-100-free-and.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/365493406f603da8/26f4f9912a042e3a?show_docid=26f4f9912a042e3a</guid>
  <author>
  jenneyl...@gmail.com
  (jenneylist)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mrz. 2010 09:24:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/eb072c109f2fe99b?show_docid=eb072c109f2fe99b</link>
  <description>
  Dear LJS, &lt;br&gt; I must make a pause for a of couple days. &lt;br&gt; Sorry, Yuri.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/eb072c109f2fe99b?show_docid=eb072c109f2fe99b</guid>
  <author>
  vi...@online.de
  (Vilen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mrz. 2010 11:54:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/bd02d58e029619e5?show_docid=bd02d58e029619e5</link>
  <description>
  I am not sure what this means but it sounds like he is not qualified &lt;br&gt; to say that the music of the Church is not representative of the music &lt;br&gt; of the time as I understand this part of the post. Am I mistaken? &lt;br&gt; Subscales? I don&#39;t know what this would mean. Without an explanation &lt;br&gt; of this term, I can&#39;t make any sense of this part of the post. It
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/bd02d58e029619e5?show_docid=bd02d58e029619e5</guid>
  <author>
  ljsche...@gmail.com
  (LJS)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mrz. 2010 20:37:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: An interesting book</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/5c075324bb4e7923?show_docid=5c075324bb4e7923</link>
  <description>
  On 7 Mrz., 23:52, Jack Campin - bogus address &amp;lt;bo...@purr.demon.co.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; It is more correct to say that his research hasn&#39;t become „ cutting- &lt;br&gt; edge historical research“. Different reasons could be named e.g. the &lt;br&gt; time and edition of publication. Besides the book doesn&#39;t directly &lt;br&gt; concern music theory.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/b3744d3dc01bb6c9/5c075324bb4e7923?show_docid=5c075324bb4e7923</guid>
  <author>
  vi...@online.de
  (Vilen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mrz. 2010 08:03:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New microtonal group at google.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/2a3e2d113bea0b12?show_docid=2a3e2d113bea0b12</link>
  <description>
  This was a comment on the E24 article you mentioned. Note that the &lt;br&gt; augmented 6th in quarter-comma meantone (or E31) is a very good &lt;br&gt; approximation of the interval 7/4, but the latter gets two commas off in &lt;br&gt; E53. So E53 + the diatonic scale degrees is probably not a good &lt;br&gt; candidate for CPP music. &lt;br&gt; Hans
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/2a3e2d113bea0b12?show_docid=2a3e2d113bea0b12</guid>
  <author>
  haberg_20080...@math.su.se
  (Hans Aberg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mrz. 2010 23:39:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New microtonal group at google.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/677b8d128d42abaa?show_docid=677b8d128d42abaa</link>
  <description>
  From Robert. There is a Page entitled Project Commator 53tet at this &lt;br&gt; group. The owner of the Project Commator site is a member of &lt;br&gt; microtonal google (he lives in the Ukraine). Our group supports all &lt;br&gt; tuning systems and temperaments. I am familiar with 53tet.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/677b8d128d42abaa?show_docid=677b8d128d42abaa</guid>
  <author>
  robertthomasmar...@gmail.com
  (robertthomasmartin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mrz. 2010 10:59:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New microtonal group at google.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/7a0ce3aaf3250971?show_docid=7a0ce3aaf3250971</link>
  <description>
  Though Arab music uses E24 notation, that is not what the play. Instead, &lt;br&gt; try say E53 with minor second m = 4, major second M = 9, and a neutral &lt;br&gt; second n = 6 E53 tonesteps or commas. The microtonal sharp raises with n &lt;br&gt; - m = 2 commas, and the microtonal flat lowers with M - n = 3 commas. &lt;br&gt; Alternatively, you might try E36, with n = 3, n = 4, M = 6, so the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/7a0ce3aaf3250971?show_docid=7a0ce3aaf3250971</guid>
  <author>
  haberg_20080...@math.su.se
  (Hans Aberg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mrz. 2010 10:22:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New microtonal group at google.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/806710515501d84f?show_docid=806710515501d84f</link>
  <description>
  On Mar 9, 11:08 am, Jack Campin - bogus address &lt;br&gt; From Robert. I&#39;m very sorry but I have no idea how I can help you. I &lt;br&gt; own another microtonal group at: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/MicroMadeEasy/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; which might better suit you. You are welcome to join both groups if &lt;br&gt; you can see a way past your difficulties.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/806710515501d84f?show_docid=806710515501d84f</guid>
  <author>
  robertthomasmar...@gmail.com
  (robertthomasmartin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mrz. 2010 01:08:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New microtonal group at google.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/a15294b15b56508e?show_docid=a15294b15b56508e</link>
  <description>
  Is there an NNTP feed for it? (I use albasani, a free server in &lt;br&gt; Germany). &lt;br&gt; Google&#39;s web-news interface is appalling at best and doesn&#39;t work &lt;br&gt; at all on the machine I normally use. &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------------- &lt;br&gt; e m a i l : j a c k @ c a m p i n . m e . u k
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.ch/group/rec.music.theory/browse_thread/thread/23a1b3e98a49d180/a15294b15b56508e?show_docid=a15294b15b56508e</guid>
  <author>
  bo...@purr.demon.co.uk
  (Jack Campin - bogus address)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mrz. 2010 00:08:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
